wallet: have two pockets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, object
Weight: 0.61
, accessory
Weight: 0.58
, handbag
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shopping bag
Weight: 0.36
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.35
, trash bag
Weight: 0.35
, business card
Weight: 0.34
, purse
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two pockets 1.00
have two billfold pockets 0.85
go in pocket 0.82
go in back pocket 0.81
be called wallets 0.78
be much worse than child wallets 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(wallet, have two pockets)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(wallet, have two billfold pockets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wallet, go in pocket)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wallet, go in pocket)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(wallet, have two billfold pockets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wallet, be called wallets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wallet, go in back pocket)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(wallet, go in back pocket)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wallet, be called wallets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wallet, be much worse than child wallets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(wallet, go in pocket)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(wallet, have two billfold pockets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(wallet, go in back pocket)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(wallet, be called wallets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wallet, go in back pocket)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wallet, go in pocket)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wallet, be called wallets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wallet, be much worse than child wallets)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wallet, have two billfold pockets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(wallet, be much worse than child wallets)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(wallet, be much worse than child wallets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(wallet, have two pockets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wallet, have two pockets)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wallet, have two pockets)