walnut: be called walnuts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called walnuts 1.00
be better than almonds 0.85
be better than pecans 0.83
be cheaper than pecans 0.81
be healthier than pecans 0.81
be called walnut trees 0.81
is fruit 0.76
have fruit 0.76
is dukkah 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit tree, have fruit)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, have fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, have fruit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(walnut tree, be called walnut trees)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, is fruit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit tree, have fruit)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(walnut tree, be called walnut trees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut tree, be called walnut trees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pear tree, is fruit)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pear tree, is fruit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(walnut, is dukkah)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(walnut, is dukkah)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(walnut, is dukkah)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(walnut, is dukkah)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be better than almonds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(walnut, be better than pecans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walnut, be cheaper than pecans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, be healthier than pecans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(walnut, be better than pecans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit tree, have fruit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(pear tree, is fruit)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(walnut tree, be called walnut trees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(walnut, be called walnuts)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit tree, have fruit)