walnut: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
is great 0.84
be good for environment 0.81
go bad 0.80
be good for building 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be important to people 0.78
be bad for environment 0.78
was very valuable product for inuit 0.78
be good making with 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wood, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for building)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wood, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wood, be important to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad for environment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wood, be important to people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wood, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(oak, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wood, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wood, be good for building)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hardwood, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mahogany, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(oak, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(oak, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(walnut, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(walnut, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(walnut, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(walnut, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(walnut, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(walnut, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wood, be important to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mahogany, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oak, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hardwood, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(walnut, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wood, be important to people)