walnut: has physical part veins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part veins 1.00
has physical part zones 0.77
has physical part roots 0.76
has physical part zone 0.76
has physical part fat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part roots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, has physical part veins)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, has physical part veins)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, has physical part veins)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part roots)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part roots)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has physical part zone)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(walnut tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part roots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pear tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has physical part zone)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(walnut tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(walnut tree, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(walnut, has physical part veins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(walnut, has physical part veins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part roots)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pear tree, has physical part zone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(walnut tree, has physical part zone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part roots)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(walnut, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zones)