walnut: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality use 0.88
has quality change 0.86
is great 0.81
be good for environment 0.80
be good for us 0.80
has shape solid 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wood, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wood, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(oak, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mahogany, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(oak, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(oak, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(walnut, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(walnut, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(walnut, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(walnut, be good for us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(walnut, be good for us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(walnut, be good for us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(walnut, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(walnut, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oak tree, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mahogany, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oak, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wood, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(walnut, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better)