walnut: is nutrition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.66
, wood
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.61
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, walnut tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nutrition 1.00
be important in food 0.76
be in food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(walnut, is nutrition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(flavor, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(walnut, is nutrition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(flavor, be in food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(flavor, be important in food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be in food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(walnut, is nutrition)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(flavor, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(walnut, is nutrition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(walnut, is nutrition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(walnut, is nutrition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(flavor, be in food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flavor, be important in food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(flavor, be in food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(walnut, is nutrition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flavor, be important in food)