walrus: has physical part fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.61
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, moose
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fat 1.00
has fatness fat 0.87
have layer of fat 0.83
has physical part teeth 0.81
store layer of fat 0.79
has physical part whiskers 0.78
has physical part ears 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(walrus, has physical part fat)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(walrus, store layer of fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has fatness fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(walrus, store layer of fat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(walrus, store layer of fat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(walrus, has fatness fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(walrus, has fatness fat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(walrus, store layer of fat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(walrus, has fatness fat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have layer of fat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(walrus, have layer of fat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(walrus, have layer of fat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(walrus, have layer of fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(walrus, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)