ward: be bad on agents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.58
, player
Weight: 0.53
, unit
Weight: 0.52
Siblings greenwich village
Weight: 0.32
, toilet seat
Weight: 0.32
, village
Weight: 0.32
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.32
, borough
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on agents 1.00
be on agents 0.96
be on back agents 0.94
be bad on agents of shield 0.88
be on agents of shield 0.85
be on back agents of shield 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ward, be bad on agents)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ward, be on agents)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ward, be on back agents)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ward, be on agents)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ward, be on back agents)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ward, be on back agents of shield)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ward, be bad on agents of shield)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ward, be on agents of shield)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ward, be bad on agents of shield)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(ward, be bad on agents of shield)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ward, be on back agents of shield)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ward, be on agents of shield)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ward, be on agents of shield)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ward, be on back agents)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ward, be on agents)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ward, be on back agents of shield)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ward, be on agents)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents of shield)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ward, be on back agents)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ward, be on agents of shield)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ward, be on back agents of shield)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ward, be bad on agents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ward, be bad on agents)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ward, be bad on agents)