warehouse: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.65
, office building
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings office
Weight: 0.66
, cold storage
Weight: 0.64
, distributor
Weight: 0.61
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, factory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality bad 0.82
has quality price 0.81
has quality wrong 0.78
has quality air 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(location, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(factory, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(office, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(office, has quality air)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(office, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(office, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(distributor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(factory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factory, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(office, has quality air)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(office, has quality air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(warehouse, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(warehouse, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(office, has quality air)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(factory, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(office, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(warehouse, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)