wart: virus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.61
, growth
Weight: 0.56
, condition
Weight: 0.56
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.55
, bump
Weight: 0.55
Siblings genital herpes
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.34
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.34
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
virus 1.00
has state virus 0.97
be like warts caused by virus 0.85
protect body from infection 0.79
be classified as infection 0.78
is contagious disease 0.78
be called disease 0.77
has state disease 0.77
is most contagious disease 0.77
protect body from pathogens 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wart, virus)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from pathogens)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wart, virus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from pathogens)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mucous membrane, protect body from pathogens)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wart, virus)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mucous membrane, protect body from pathogens)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wart, virus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lyme disease, be classified as infection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be classified as infection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wart, virus)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wart, has state virus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wart, has state virus)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wart, has state virus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wart, has state virus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wart, virus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mucous membrane, protect body from pathogens)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called disease)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(genital herpes, is most contagious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(genital herpes, is contagious disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be classified as infection)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mucous membrane, protect body from pathogens)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(wart, virus)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mucous membrane, protect body from infection)