washing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, method
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wash cloth
Weight: 0.35
, hand sanitizer
Weight: 0.33
, dirty clothes
Weight: 0.33
, bathing
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
feel good 0.80
is everyday good 0.76
be in water better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(washing, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(washing, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bathing, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(work, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(washing, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(washing, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wash cloth, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bathing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bathing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(washing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(washing, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(washing, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(washing, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(washing, has quality wrong)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(washing, has quality wrong)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(washing, has quality wrong)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(washing, feel good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(washing, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(washing, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(washing, is everyday good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(washing, be in water better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(washing, is everyday good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(washing, be in water better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality wrong)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(washing, be in water better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(washing, is everyday good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(washing, feel good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(washing, be in water better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(washing, is everyday good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(washing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wash cloth, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hand sanitizer, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bathing, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(work, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(washing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)