washington: has state state

Related concepts

Parents	new york Weight: 0.71 , montana Weight: 0.66 , national capital Weight: 0.62 , new orleans Weight: 0.62 , institution Weight: 0.61
Siblings	maryland Weight: 0.58 , new york city Weight: 0.38 , miami Weight: 0.37 , philadelphia Weight: 0.36 , las vegas Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has state state	1.00
is best state	0.80
was chosen for state capitol	0.76
have several state departments	0.76
is national	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(washington, has state state)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(montana, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(washington, has state state)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(montana, is best state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(washington, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(montana, has state state)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(new york, has state state)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(montana, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(new york, has state state)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(montana, is best state)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(montana, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(maryland, has state state)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(new york city, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(new york, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(washington, has state state)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(montana, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(washington, has state state)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(montana, is best state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(washington, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(new york city, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(new york city, has state state)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(maryland, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(maryland, has state state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(maryland, is best state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(washington, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(washington, is best state)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(washington, was chosen for state capitol)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(washington, have several state departments)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(washington, is national)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(washington, is national)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(washington, is national)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(washington, is national)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(washington, have several state departments)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(washington, is best state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(washington, have several state departments)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(washington, was chosen for state capitol)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(washington, have several state departments)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(washington, is best state)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(washington, is best state)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(washington, was chosen for state capitol)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(washington, was chosen for state capitol)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(washington, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(montana, has state state)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(new york, has state state)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(montana, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(new york city, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(maryland, has state state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(montana, has state state)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(new york, has state state)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(washington, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(montana, is best state)