waste: is global issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is global issue 1.00
is global problem 0.91
is issue 0.87
problem for world 0.79
problem for entire world 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(trash, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(trash, is issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(trash, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(trash, is global issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(waste, is global issue)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waste, is issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(waste, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(waste, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waste, is global problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(waste, is global problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waste, is global problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(waste, problem for world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for entire world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(waste, problem for entire world)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for entire world)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(waste, problem for entire world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waste, is global issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trash, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(trash, is global issue)