waste: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is global issue 0.87
has state problem 0.78
be issue in australia 0.77
problem for world 0.76
is enviormental concern 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waste, is issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waste, is issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(action, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(action, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(trash, is issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(landfill, is enviormental concern)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(waste, is issue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(waste, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(trash, is issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(trash, is issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(landfill, is enviormental concern)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(landfill, is enviormental concern)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(trash, is global issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(waste, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(waste, be issue in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(waste, is global issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(waste, be issue in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(waste, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(waste, is global issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(waste, problem for world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(waste, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(waste, be issue in australia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(waste, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waste, is global issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(waste, be issue in australia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waste, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trash, is issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(landfill, is enviormental concern)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(trash, is global issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(waste, is issue)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)