waste: problem for world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
problem for world 1.00
is global problem 0.91
problem for entire world 0.90
has state problem 0.90
is global issue 0.79
is environmental problem 0.79
be problem in australia 0.76
is issue 0.76
be important in country 0.76
raise problems for humanity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(resource, raise problems for humanity)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(action, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(resource, raise problems for humanity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(action, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(resource, raise problems for humanity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(trash, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(action, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(resource, raise problems for humanity)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(landfill, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(landfill, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(trash, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trash, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(trash, is issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(trash, is issue)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(trash, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(trash, is global issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(waste, problem for world)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(waste, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(waste, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waste, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(waste, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(waste, is issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(waste, is environmental problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waste, is environmental problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(waste, is environmental problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waste, is global problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for entire world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(waste, is global issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(waste, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(waste, problem for entire world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(waste, is global issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(waste, is global problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waste, is global problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waste, is global issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(waste, is global issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is environmental problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waste, problem for entire world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, be problem in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(waste, problem for entire world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(waste, be problem in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waste, is issue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(waste, be problem in australia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(waste, be problem in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(waste, problem for world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(resource, raise problems for humanity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trash, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(landfill, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(trash, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(trash, is global issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(action, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(waste, problem for world)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(resource, raise problems for humanity)