watch: be at bedroom drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pocket watch
Weight: 0.78
, item
Weight: 0.59
, instrument
Weight: 0.56
, gem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wrist watch
Weight: 0.68
, tv set
Weight: 0.32
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.32
, dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, action figure
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bedroom drawer 1.00
be at garage 0.78
be at house 0.77
be at child room 0.76
be at bathtub 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tv set, be at garage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tv set, be at house)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(action figure, be at bathtub)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(action figure, be at child room)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(action figure, be at child room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(action figure, be at child room)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tv set, be at garage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tv set, be at garage)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(action figure, be at bathtub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(action figure, be at bathtub)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tv set, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tv set, be at house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(watch, be at bedroom drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(watch, be at bedroom drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tv set, be at house)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tv set, be at garage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(action figure, be at child room)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at bedroom drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(action figure, be at bathtub)