water heater: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot water
Weight: 0.80
, household appliance
Weight: 0.71
, heating
Weight: 0.70
, plumbing
Weight: 0.70
Siblings electric heater
Weight: 0.41
, dryer
Weight: 0.37
, heat sink
Weight: 0.37
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.37
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
be 100 efficient 1.00
be efficient 1.00
is more efficient 0.97
be efficient 100 percent 0.85
is more effective 0.82
is effective 0.80
be more effective cleaning 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hot water, be more effective cleaning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hot water, be more effective cleaning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(water heater, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(water heater, is efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(water heater, is more efficient)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hot water, be more effective cleaning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hot water, be more effective cleaning)