water heater: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot water
Weight: 0.80
, household appliance
Weight: 0.71
, heating
Weight: 0.70
, plumbing
Weight: 0.70
Siblings electric heater
Weight: 0.41
, dryer
Weight: 0.37
, heat sink
Weight: 0.37
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.37
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
is efficient 0.97
be 100 efficient 0.97
be efficient 0.97
is more effective 0.86
be efficient 100 percent 0.85
is effective 0.79
be more effective cleaning 0.78
be cleaner than water 0.77
be faster than water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot water, be faster than water)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot water, be faster than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hot water, be faster than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot water, be faster than water)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(water heater, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(water heater, is efficient)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hot water, be faster than water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hot water, be more effective cleaning)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hot water, be faster than water)