water plant: be needed in fish tank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utility
Weight: 0.62
, water
Weight: 0.61
, vegetation
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
Siblings power plant
Weight: 0.39
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.38
, water pump
Weight: 0.37
, shallow water
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in fish tank 1.00
be needed in fish tanks 0.94
be dependent on fish 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(water pump, be needed in fish tank)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(water pump, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water pump, be needed in fish tank)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(water plant, be needed in fish tank)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(water plant, be needed in fish tanks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water plant, be needed in fish tanks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(water plant, be needed in fish tanks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(water plant, be dependent on fish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be needed in fish tanks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(water plant, be dependent on fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(water plant, be dependent on fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be dependent on fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be needed in fish tank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(water plant, be needed in fish tank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(water plant, be needed in fish tank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(water pump, be needed in fish tank)