water polo: be baseball

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.70
, water
Weight: 0.68
, event
Weight: 0.61
, competition
Weight: 0.60
Siblings polo
Weight: 0.38
, ocean water
Weight: 0.37
, water pump
Weight: 0.37
, shallow water
Weight: 0.37
, sea water
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be baseball 1.00
be then baseball 0.96
be better baseball 0.95
be better then baseball 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(water polo, be baseball)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(water polo, be then baseball)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(water polo, be then baseball)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(water polo, be then baseball)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(water polo, be better baseball)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(water polo, be better baseball)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(water polo, be better baseball)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(water polo, be better then baseball)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(water polo, be better then baseball)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(water polo, be better then baseball)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(water polo, be then baseball)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(water polo, be better baseball)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(water polo, be better then baseball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(water polo, be baseball)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(water polo, be baseball)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(water polo, be baseball)