watermelon: be good for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.65
, melon
Weight: 0.64
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, variety
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cantaloupe
Weight: 0.37
, crab apple
Weight: 0.37
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.37
, strawberry
Weight: 0.37
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for dogs 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.97
be harmful to dogs 0.86
be poisonous to dogs 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(melon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watermelon, be good for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(melon, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(melon, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cantaloupe, be good for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(strawberry, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(melon, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cantaloupe, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cantaloupe, be good for dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(strawberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(strawberry, be good for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(watermelon, be good for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(watermelon, be bad for dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(watermelon, be bad for dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(watermelon, be bad for dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watermelon, be good for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(melon, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cantaloupe, be good for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(strawberry, be good for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(watermelon, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(melon, be bad for dogs)