watershed: be important in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings estuary
Weight: 0.33
, shoreline
Weight: 0.33
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, wildlife
Weight: 0.32
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in water 1.00
is very important 0.75
be important to environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(watershed, be important in water)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(watershed, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(watershed, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(watershed, be important to environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(watershed, is very important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(watershed, is very important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(watershed, is very important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(watershed, is very important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(watershed, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(watershed, be important in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(watershed, be important in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(watershed, be important in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to environment)