wave: be involved in erosion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.61
, particle
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings radio wave
Weight: 0.83
, gamma ray
Weight: 0.69
, sine
Weight: 0.35
, tidal wave
Weight: 0.35
, tide
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be involved in erosion 1.00
cause erosion 0.90
be agent of erosion 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tide, cause erosion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tide, cause erosion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tide, cause erosion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wave, be involved in erosion)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wave, cause erosion)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(wave, be agent of erosion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(wave, cause erosion)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wave, cause erosion)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wave, be agent of erosion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wave, be agent of erosion)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wave, cause erosion)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wave, be agent of erosion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(wave, be involved in erosion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wave, be involved in erosion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(wave, be involved in erosion)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tide, cause erosion)