wavelength: affect diffraction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.66
, variable
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.67
, infrared
Weight: 0.57
, violet
Weight: 0.55
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.55
, nanometer
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect diffraction 1.00
affect absorbance 0.81
affect refraction 0.81
is wavelength 0.78
change at nanoscale 0.78
have wavelength 0.77
diffract more 0.77
be different from infrared radiation 0.77
be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography 0.77
be readable by combinations produced by positron emission tomography 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(property, change at nanoscale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(property, change at nanoscale)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(property, change at nanoscale)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(property, change at nanoscale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect diffraction)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect refraction)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect absorbance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect refraction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect absorbance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect refraction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect absorbance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(wavelength, diffract more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect absorbance)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect refraction)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(wavelength, diffract more)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wavelength, diffract more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(property, change at nanoscale)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect diffraction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(property, change at nanoscale)