wavelength: affect resolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.66
, variable
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.67
, infrared
Weight: 0.57
, violet
Weight: 0.55
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.55
, nanometer
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect resolution 1.00
be main limiting factor on resolution 0.84
be main limiting factor on limit of resolution 0.81
be main limiting factor on resolution in microscopy 0.81
be main limiting factor on resolution in light microscopy 0.81
be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in microscopy 0.80
be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in light microscopy 0.80
affect motion 0.80
affect motion of object 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, affect motion of object)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, affect motion of object)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect motion of object)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, affect motion of object)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in microscopy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in light microscopy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in microscopy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in light microscopy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in microscopy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in microscopy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in light microscopy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in light microscopy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in microscopy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in microscopy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in light microscopy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in light microscopy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in microscopy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in microscopy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wavelength, be main limiting factor on resolution in light microscopy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wavelength, be main limiting factor on limit of resolution in light microscopy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect motion of object)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(wavelength, affect resolution)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect motion of object)