wavelength: diffract more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.66
, variable
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.67
, infrared
Weight: 0.57
, violet
Weight: 0.55
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.55
, nanometer
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
diffract more 1.00
refract less 0.81
be more dangerous than infrared 0.81
refract more 0.81
be more dangerous than ultraviolet 0.79
be more dangerous than x rays 0.79
refract most 0.79
be different from infrared radiation 0.79
be most penetrating of electromagnetic rays 0.78
be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(violet, refract more)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(violet, refract most)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ultraviolet, be more dangerous than infrared)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be more dangerous than x rays)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be more dangerous than ultraviolet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be most penetrating of electromagnetic rays)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gamma ray, be most penetrating of electromagnetic rays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be most penetrating of electromagnetic rays)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(gamma ray, be more dangerous than ultraviolet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be more dangerous than ultraviolet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gamma ray, be more dangerous than x rays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, be more dangerous than x rays)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ultraviolet, be more dangerous than infrared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ultraviolet, be more dangerous than infrared)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(violet, refract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(violet, refract more)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(violet, refract most) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(violet, refract most)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(wavelength, diffract more)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wavelength, refract less)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wavelength, refract less)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(wavelength, refract less)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, refract less)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wavelength, diffract more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be readable by photomultiplier-scintillator combinations produced by positron emission tomography)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be different from infrared radiation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be most penetrating of electromagnetic rays)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be more dangerous than ultraviolet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(gamma ray, be more dangerous than x rays)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ultraviolet, be more dangerous than infrared)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(violet, refract most)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, diffract more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(violet, refract more)