wavelength: have higher frequency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.66
, variable
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.54
Siblings gamma ray
Weight: 0.67
, infrared
Weight: 0.57
, violet
Weight: 0.55
, ultraviolet
Weight: 0.55
, nanometer
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
have higher frequency 1.00
have lower frequency 0.98
have frequency 0.93
have highest frequency 0.91
be related to frequency 0.91
affect frequency 0.91
is highest frequency 0.90
relate to frequency 0.88
be inversely proportional to frequency 0.87
be related to frequency for wave 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(violet, is highest frequency)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(violet, have highest frequency)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gamma ray, have frequency)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, have frequency)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(violet, have highest frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(violet, have highest frequency)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(violet, is highest frequency)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(violet, is highest frequency)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(wavelength, have lower frequency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wavelength, affect frequency)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wavelength, be inversely proportional to frequency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wavelength, be related to frequency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(wavelength, relate to frequency)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wavelength, be related to frequency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(wavelength, have higher frequency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(gamma ray, have frequency)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gamma ray, have highest frequency)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(violet, have highest frequency)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, have higher frequency)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(violet, is highest frequency)