weakness: has quality virtue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
Siblings defense
Weight: 0.61
, selfishness
Weight: 0.60
, vanity
Weight: 0.57
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality virtue 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(weakness, has quality virtue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality virtue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality virtue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)