wealth: has quality inequality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.65
, blessing
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
Siblings knowledge
Weight: 0.33
, happiness
Weight: 0.33
, wisdom
Weight: 0.32
, talent
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality inequality 1.00
be more unequal than income 0.81
is used as dimensions of social stratification 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(wealth, has quality inequality)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(wealth, is used as dimensions of social stratification)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(wealth, is used as dimensions of social stratification)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wealth, be more unequal than income)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(wealth, is used as dimensions of social stratification)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(wealth, is used as dimensions of social stratification)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wealth, has quality inequality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(wealth, has quality inequality)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wealth, has quality inequality)