weapon: were even considered built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
were even considered built 1.00
were created 0.79
were made 0.78
were tested in 1950s 0.76
were devoloped 0.76
were needed 0.76
be developed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(machine gun, were created)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(weapon, were even considered built)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(weapon, were created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(weapon, were made)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(weapon, be developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(weapon, be developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(weapon, be developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were created)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(weapon, were created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(machine gun, were created)