weapon: were needed in ancient china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed in ancient china 1.00
were used in ancient egypt 0.85
was important in ancient rome 0.85
were needed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed in ancient china)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were used in ancient egypt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weapon, were used in ancient egypt)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was important in ancient rome)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(weapon, were used in ancient egypt)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, was important in ancient rome)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(weapon, were used in ancient egypt)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(weapon, was important in ancient rome)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(weapon, was important in ancient rome)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed in ancient china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(weapon, were needed in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed in ancient china)