weapon: were tested in 1950s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.82
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
were tested in 1950s 1.00
be tested in space 0.89
be tested underground 0.84
be tested in deserts 0.82
were even considered built 0.76
were devoloped 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(weapon, be tested in space)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be tested in space)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(weapon, be tested in space)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be tested in deserts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(weapon, be tested in deserts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be tested underground)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(weapon, be tested underground)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(weapon, be tested underground)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(weapon, be tested in deserts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(weapon, be tested in space)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(weapon, were even considered built)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(weapon, be tested in deserts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(weapon, be tested underground)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(weapon, were devoloped)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were tested in 1950s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(weapon, were tested in 1950s)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(weapon, were tested in 1950s)