weasel: be at hollow log

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, carnivore
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, vermin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings badger
Weight: 0.35
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.33
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hollow log 1.00
be at hollow 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hollow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(fox, be at hollow)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hollow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(weasel, be at hollow log)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at hollow log)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(weasel, be at hollow log)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at hollow log)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, be at hollow)