weasel: be at it den

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, carnivore
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, vermin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings badger
Weight: 0.35
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.33
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at it den 1.00
be at den 0.99
be at field forest and in den 0.88
be at beaver den 0.87
be at lair 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at lair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at beaver den)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(fox, be at field forest and in den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(beaver, be at beaver den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at beaver den)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, be at lair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fox, be at lair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(weasel, be at it den)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at den)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(weasel, be at den)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at den)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weasel, be at den)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(weasel, be at it den)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beaver, be at beaver den)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fox, be at field forest and in den)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at it den) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fox, be at lair)