weasel: be at your pocket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, carnivore
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, vermin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings badger
Weight: 0.35
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.33
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at your pocket 1.00
be at your own home 0.77
be at sock if you read dr 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at sock if you read dr)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fox, be at sock if you read dr)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fox, be at sock if you read dr)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(weasel, be at your pocket)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at your own home)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(weasel, be at your own home)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at your own home)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(weasel, be at your own home)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at your pocket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(weasel, be at your pocket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at your pocket)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fox, be at sock if you read dr)