weatherman: use screens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.46
, expert
Weight: 0.45
, scientist
Weight: 0.44
, group
Weight: 0.43
, idiot
Weight: 0.39
Siblings meteorologist
Weight: 0.33
, astronomer
Weight: 0.30
, television show
Weight: 0.30
, geologist
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
use screens 1.00
use green screens 0.94
use screen 0.90
use green screen 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(film, use green screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screens)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(film, use green screens)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(film, use green screens)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use green screens)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(film, use green screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use screens)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(meteorologist, use green screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use green screens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(weatherman, use screens)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use green screens)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screen)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use green screen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use screen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(weatherman, use screen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(weatherman, use green screens)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(weatherman, use green screen)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use green screens)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(weatherman, use green screen)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(weatherman, use green screen)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(weatherman, use green screens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(weatherman, use screens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(film, use green screens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use green screens)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(weatherman, use screens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(film, use green screens)