web: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	web site Weight: 0.85 , world wide web Weight: 0.73 , web browser Weight: 0.72 , tool Weight: 0.64 , information Weight: 0.62
Siblings	net Weight: 0.62 , portal Weight: 0.60 , mashup Weight: 0.53 , web page Weight: 0.42 , website Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality worth	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(web, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(web, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(web, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(net, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(portal, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(portal, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(portal, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(net, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(net, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(web, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(web, has quality bad)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(web, has quality worth)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(web, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(net, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(portal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(web, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)