webbing: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.61
, gear
Weight: 0.44
, equipment
Weight: 0.42
, product
Weight: 0.42
, artifact
Weight: 0.42
Siblings adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, burlap
Weight: 0.33
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, suture
Weight: 0.33
, catgut
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(webbing, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(webbing, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(webbing, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(webbing, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(webbing, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(webbing, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(webbing, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(webbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)