webcam: is down

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, video
Weight: 0.58
, digital camera
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, projector
Weight: 0.36
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is down 1.00
is upside down 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(projector, is upside down)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(projector, is down)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(projector, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(projector, is down)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(projector, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(projector, is upside down)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(webcam, is down)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(webcam, is upside down)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(webcam, is upside down)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(webcam, is upside down)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is upside down)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is down)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(webcam, is down)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(projector, is down)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(projector, is upside down)