webcam: is input devices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, video
Weight: 0.58
, digital camera
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, projector
Weight: 0.36
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is input devices 1.00
is input device 0.96
is output device 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(webcam, is input devices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(projector, is output device)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is output device)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(webcam, is input devices)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer monitor, is output device)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is output device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(projector, is output device)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(projector, is output device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(webcam, is input devices)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(webcam, is input device)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input device)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is output device)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(webcam, is output device)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(webcam, is input device)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(webcam, is input device)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(webcam, is output device)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(webcam, is output device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(webcam, is input devices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is output device)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(projector, is output device)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(webcam, is input devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)