wedding cake: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chocolate cake
Weight: 0.76
, cake
Weight: 0.74
, dessert
Weight: 0.72
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.71
Siblings christmas cake
Weight: 0.41
, fruitcake
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.37
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.37
, apple pie
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality change 0.86
is good for 0.82
have bad reputation 0.81
taste bad 0.80
has quality joke 0.80
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cake, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cake, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fruitcake, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(fruitcake, have bad reputation)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruitcake, has quality joke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cheesecake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fruitcake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fruitcake, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(fruitcake, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fruitcake, have bad reputation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fruitcake, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fruitcake, has quality joke)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(wedding cake, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wedding cake, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(wedding cake, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cake, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fruitcake, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cheesecake, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fruitcake, have bad reputation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is good for)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruitcake, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cake, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(wedding cake, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)