well: be at rural area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, development
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, baseball field
Weight: 0.31
, soccer field
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rural area 1.00
be at yard of rural house 0.86
be at countryside 0.79
be at farm country 0.76
be at town 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(field, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(well, be at rural area)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(field, be at countryside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(well, be at rural area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(field, be at rural area)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(field, be at countryside)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(field, be at rural area)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(field, be at countryside)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at town)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at countryside)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(field, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(well, be at rural area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(field, be at countryside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(well, be at rural area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(soccer field, be at countryside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at countryside)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(soccer field, be at town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(well, be at rural area)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(well, be at yard of rural house)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(well, be at yard of rural house)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(well, be at yard of rural house)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(well, be at countryside)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(well, be at farm country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(well, be at yard of rural house)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(well, be at countryside)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(well, be at farm country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(well, be at farm country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(well, be at countryside)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(well, be at countryside)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(well, be at farm country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(well, be at rural area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(field, be at rural area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(field, be at countryside)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at countryside)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(field, be at rural area)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(well, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(field, be at countryside)