wendy: has hate mcdonalds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.57
, character
Weight: 0.57
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.57
, woman
Weight: 0.54
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.35
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.34
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.34
, william james
Weight: 0.34
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has hate mcdonalds 1.00
be healthier than mcdonalds 0.83
get hate 0.83
be mcelroy mad at roger ver 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wendy, get hate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(wendy, get hate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(wendy, get hate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wendy, get hate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wendy, be mcelroy mad at roger ver)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(wendy, be healthier than mcdonalds)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wendy, be mcelroy mad at roger ver)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wendy, be mcelroy mad at roger ver)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wendy, be mcelroy mad at roger ver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wendy, has hate mcdonalds)