wendy: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	friend Weight: 0.57 , character Weight: 0.57 , fast food chain Weight: 0.57 , woman Weight: 0.54 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.50
Siblings	sherlock holmes Weight: 0.35 , henry david thoreau Weight: 0.34 , mcdonalds Weight: 0.34 , william james Weight: 0.34 , spongebob squarepants Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(wendy, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(friend, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(wendy, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(wendy, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(friend, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(wendy, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(wendy, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(wendy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(wendy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)