west virginia: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south carolina
Weight: 0.79
, north carolina
Weight: 0.78
, virginia
Weight: 0.77
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.76
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.38
, florida
Weight: 0.38
, charleston
Weight: 0.37
, norfolk
Weight: 0.36
, charlotte
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
have bad reputation 0.81
is poor 0.78
is poor state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(south carolina, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(south carolina, is poor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(south carolina, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(west virginia, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(west virginia, have bad reputation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, have bad reputation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(west virginia, have bad reputation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(west virginia, have bad reputation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(west virginia, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)