west virginia: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south carolina
Weight: 0.79
, north carolina
Weight: 0.78
, virginia
Weight: 0.77
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.76
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.38
, florida
Weight: 0.38
, charleston
Weight: 0.37
, norfolk
Weight: 0.36
, charlotte
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
is poor state 0.95
has quality bad 0.78
is miserable state 0.76
is most miserable state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(south carolina, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(south carolina, is poor)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virginia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(virginia, is most miserable state)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(west virginia, is poor)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(west virginia, is poor state)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(west virginia, is miserable state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(west virginia, is most miserable state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(virginia, is most miserable state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(west virginia, is poor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(virginia, has quality bad)