wetland: be protected in most areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected in most areas 1.00
be protected in areas 0.97
is protected 0.89
need protected 0.87
protect surrounding land areas 0.83
protect environment 0.77
provide habitats for many living things 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(estuary, need protected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(estuary, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(estuary, is protected)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(grassland, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(grassland, is protected)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(estuary, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(estuary, need protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wetland, need protected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, need protected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wetland, protect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wetland, need protected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wetland, protect environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(estuary, is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(grassland, is protected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(estuary, need protected)