wetland: important to health of overall environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
important to health of overall environment 1.00
be good for environment 0.85
protect environment 0.77
improve water quality 0.75
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pond, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pond, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pond, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(wetland, be good for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wetland, protect environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wetland, protect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wetland, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pond, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)