wetland: improve water quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve water quality 1.00
affect water quality in area 0.86
has quality good 0.83
has quality bad 0.80
contribute to water supply 0.78
important to health of overall environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wetland, improve water quality)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(wetland, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wetland, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)