wetland: need protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need protected 1.00
is protected 0.96
be protected in areas 0.90
be protected in most areas 0.87
need preserved 0.83
protect environment 0.79
is preserved 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(estuary, need protected)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(estuary, need protected)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(estuary, need protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(estuary, is protected)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(estuary, is protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(grassland, is protected)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(grassland, is protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wetland, need protected)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wetland, need preserved)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wetland, need preserved)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need preserved)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wetland, protect environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wetland, need preserved)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wetland, protect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, need protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(estuary, is protected)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(estuary, need protected)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(grassland, is protected)